Shell CEO Warns Against Cutting Oil and Gas Production, Citing Dangers and Need for Transition

In an interview with the BBC, Wael Sawan, the CEO of energy giant Shell, defended the company's decision to continue current oil production until 2030, claiming that cutting oil and gas production would be "dangerous and irresponsible." Sawan argued that the world still heavily relies on oil and gas, as the transition to renewable energy is not happening rapidly enough to replace fossil fuels. He further warned that increased demand from China and a cold winter in Europe could lead to higher energy prices and bills.

(Shell co)

However, Sawan's remarks drew criticism from climate scientists and activists who argue that Shell should prioritize accelerating the green transition rather than prolonging the use of oil and gas. Professor Emily Shuckburgh from the University of Cambridge emphasized the importance of focusing on a just transition that considers the well-being of the most vulnerable in society. The push to move away from fossil fuels is driven by the global commitment to limit global warming to 1.5°C this century. Last year, the European Commission outlined plans to accelerate the EU's shift to green energy and reduce its dependency on Russian oil and gas. Nevertheless, many countries lack the necessary infrastructure to transition to more sustainable energy sources.


Sawan highlighted an example of the consequences of a sudden transition, citing an international bidding war for gas that resulted in poorer countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh being unable to afford liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipments, leaving their populations to rely on candlelight. Climate experts, however, argue that this represents a false choice, as renewables are cleaner, cheaper, and better for public health. Regarding the United Kingdom, Sawan expressed concerns about the lack of clarity and stability in energy policy and taxation, which could deter investment in the country. He emphasized the need for the UK government to make a clear decision on imported versus domestic production. Shell recently decided to sell its stake in a major undeveloped oil field at Cambo, signaling potential challenges for the North Sea oil industry.


Furthermore, Sawan mentioned the warm reception Shell received at a recent investors' meeting in the United States, hinting at the possibility of relocating the company's headquarters and stock market listing to the US. Such a move could bridge the valuation gap with American oil companies, but it is not a priority in the short term.

In summary, Shell's CEO argues that cutting oil and gas production would be dangerous and irresponsible due to the world's continued reliance on fossil fuels. However, climate scientists and activists contend that accelerating the transition to renewable energy is essential and that a just transition must prioritize the well-being of vulnerable communities. As the global race to ditch fossil fuels intensifies, the UK faces challenges in its energy policy and taxation stability, potentially impacting future investment. Shell's warm reception in the US raises questions about the company's long-term plans and adds to concerns about London's stock market losing its appeal as a fundraising venue for multinational companies.