A recent study published in the journal Environmental Research Letters provides valuable insights into the relocation patterns of Americans participating in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) buyout program. The program aims to move homeowners away from flood-prone areas and mitigate the risks associated with climate change-induced weather events. The study analyzed data from nearly 10,000 buyouts between 1990 and 2017, revealing that while many individuals chose to remain within the same floodplain, their overall flood risk decreased following relocation.
The research also sheds light on racial disparities, with predominantly White homeowners predominantly moving to similar communities, while residents of predominantly Black and Hispanic neighbourhoods tended to relocate to areas with different demographic compositions. These findings underscore the importance of understanding relocation patterns as managed retreat becomes increasingly necessary due to climate change impacts.
In the United States, the government has been implementing the FEMA buyout program for over four decades, offering financial assistance to homeowners in flood-risk areas to encourage them to relocate. However, until now, little was known about where these homeowners were moving and whether their new locations effectively reduced their flood risk. The recent study conducted by researchers from Rice University aimed to address this knowledge gap. Using flood risk estimates, housing values, race, and income data from the US Census Bureau, as well as FEMA relocation data, the researchers built a nationwide database to track the movement of nearly 10,000 Americans who sold their flood-prone homes through the buyout program. The analysis revealed that participants in the program tended to move within the same floodplain, suggesting that they preferred to stay in familiar areas despite the risks.
Although the average distance between their former and new homes was around seven miles, the study found that approximately 74% of homeowners relocated within 20 miles of their old flood-damaged residences. While this may seem counterintuitive to the goal of reducing flood risk, the researchers concluded that overall, participants managed to decrease their future flood risk by up to 65%. This indicates that the buyout program has been successful in mitigating flood-related hazards for those involved. Moreover, the study unveiled significant racial disparities in the relocation patterns of buyout participants. The researchers observed that around 96% of homeowners from predominantly White neighborhoods relocated to another majority White community. In contrast, residents of predominantly Black and Hispanic communities were more likely to move to neighborhoods with different demographic compositions. Only 48% of Black homeowners who participated in the buyout program moved to predominantly Black neighborhoods. This disparity highlights how the program plays out differently in various communities and underlines the need to consider the social dimensions of managed retreat initiatives.
The study also examined the flood risk probabilities for different areas. It revealed that buyout areas with predominantly White homeowners had a nearly 90% chance of flooding by 2050. In comparison, majority-Black buyout areas had a roughly 50% chance of flooding. These findings suggest that White residents tend to participate in buyouts when flood risks are more severe, whereas residents of minority communities face a higher risk of being exposed to future flooding. As climate change continues to exacerbate flood risks and increase insurance costs, understanding where people choose to relocate is crucial for developing effective managed retreat programs. The study's findings emphasize the importance of considering the social and racial dynamics at play during relocation processes. By doing so, policymakers and stakeholders can ensure that vulnerable communities are not disproportionately burdened and can address potential inequalities that may arise in the context of managed retreat initiatives.
A CSR Initiative of
Designed and Executed by
Implemented by
Technology is a useful servant, but a dangerous master, it was rightly said. Electronic devices have grown into an inevitable part of our daily lives.
